Ch3Beverage: Complete first part of the exercise
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,6 +6,11 @@ public abstract class Beverage {
|
||||
public abstract double Cost();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// public static class BeveragePrintExtension {
|
||||
// public static void Print(this Beverage value) {
|
||||
// Console.WriteLine($"{value.Description} ${value.Cost()}");
|
||||
// }
|
||||
// }
|
||||
/*
|
||||
The only real benefit of putting the constructor in CondimentDecorator is if you need to:
|
||||
Add validation logic (e.g., null checks) once for all decorators
|
||||
@@ -18,7 +23,15 @@ public abstract class Beverage {
|
||||
but not a hard rule. Your implementation follows the Decorator pattern correctly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
public abstract class CondimentDecorator : Beverage;
|
||||
public abstract class CondimentDecorator(Beverage beverage) : Beverage {
|
||||
protected Beverage Beverage { get; } = beverage;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Adding { get; } this Beverage is not a Field but a read-only Property
|
||||
* providing a contract that child classes cannot change this value.
|
||||
* Leaving a normal field `protected Beverage Beverage = beverage` allows
|
||||
* child classes to freely reassign it.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public class Espresso : Beverage {
|
||||
public override string Description => "Espresso";
|
||||
@@ -44,8 +57,21 @@ public class Decaf : Beverage {
|
||||
public override double Cost() => 1.05;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public class Mocha(Beverage beverage) : CondimentDecorator {
|
||||
public override string Description => $"{beverage.Description}, Mocha";
|
||||
// Yes, this approach is really uglier because it relies aggressively
|
||||
// on inheritance (protected "invisible" variable) instead of basic explicit composition.
|
||||
// But it allows code reuse at the level of the decorator base class...
|
||||
public class Mocha(Beverage beverage) : CondimentDecorator(beverage) {
|
||||
public override string Description => $"{Beverage.Description}, Mocha";
|
||||
|
||||
public override double Cost() => beverage.Cost() + 0.20;
|
||||
public override double Cost() => Beverage.Cost() + 0.20;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public class Soy(Beverage beverage) : CondimentDecorator(beverage) {
|
||||
public override string Description => $"{Beverage.Description}, Soy";
|
||||
public override double Cost() => Beverage.Cost() + 0.15;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public class Whip(Beverage beverage) : CondimentDecorator(beverage) {
|
||||
public override string Description => $"{Beverage.Description}, Whipped";
|
||||
public override double Cost() => Beverage.Cost() + 0.10;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -1,3 +1,24 @@
|
||||
// See https://aka.ms/new-console-template for more information
|
||||
|
||||
Console.WriteLine("Hello, World!");
|
||||
using Ch3Beverage;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Beverage beverage = new Espresso();
|
||||
beverage.Print();
|
||||
Beverage beverage2 = new DarkRoast();
|
||||
beverage2 = new Mocha(new Mocha(beverage2));
|
||||
beverage2 = new Whip(beverage2);
|
||||
beverage2.Print();
|
||||
Beverage beverage3 = new HouseBlend();
|
||||
beverage3 = new Soy(beverage3);
|
||||
beverage3 = new Mocha(beverage3);
|
||||
beverage3 = new Whip(beverage3);
|
||||
beverage3.Print();
|
||||
|
||||
public static class BeveragePrintExtension {
|
||||
// Bored, I've mode an extension method to easily print a Beverage. LOL.
|
||||
// Because Bored, I didn't wrap this in a namespace... in real code it's necessary.
|
||||
public static void Print(this Beverage value) {
|
||||
Console.WriteLine($"{value.Description} ${value.Cost()}");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user